NYCPHP Meetup

[Dan Horning]

That's actually the myPHPnuke that you are refering to .. Which postnuke
is a fork of

Dan
------
Email: info at dwc.to
------
Online on
AIM - crewpassguy (or dsoundmn1 for emergencies)
ICQ - 14308614
MSN - dan at dwc.to
YIM - crewpassguy



-----Original Message-----
From: Oktay Altunergil [mailto:nyphp at altunergil.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:55 AM
To: NYPHP Talk
Subject: Re: [nycphp-talk] Happy Code


A vast majority of the postnuke developers left the project and went on
to create their own fork. ( I think there might even be only one guy
left on the postnuke project ). 

This is based on chitchat with one of the leaving guys. He might be
biased. It also doesn't say anything about the code itself. But if you
liked postnuke, you might want to stay with the developers, not the
project :)

My candiate for good code and good design would be the Mantis Bug
Tracker. http://mantisbt.sourceforge.net

It's small, fast and very clean. It has only gotten better with time
too.

oktay

On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:48:42 -0500
Dan Horning <dan at dwc.to> wrote:

> IMHO
> 
> I believe that the package from Postnuke is well written .. It's been 
> tested over a large arena... Without failing.. Some people just try to

> use it where it doesn't need to be used. It's a very modular system.. 
> Which is what an application should be
> 
> Dan
> ------
> Email: info at dwc.to
> ------
> Online on
> AIM - crewpassguy (or dsoundmn1 for emergencies)
> ICQ - 14308614
> MSN - dan at dwc.to
> YIM - crewpassguy
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Musil [mailto:jim at nettmedia.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:28 AM
> To: NYPHP Talk
> Subject: [nycphp-talk] Happy Code
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Given all the talk about standards and bad code, I'm wondering if 
> anyone would like to point to an open source application that is well 
> designed and well written.
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


--- Unsubscribe at http://nyphp.org/list/ ---