[nycphp-talk] security? we don't need no stinkin security!
Chris Snyder
csnyder at chxo.com
Wed Dec 3 08:34:05 EST 2003
Tim Gales wrote:
>John Lacey writes:
>".. wouldn't it be
> nice if well-designed secure components (pcom?) were
> available that one could go to the 'lego box' and pull out
> what you need to put it together..."
>
>Are you saying that Pear doesn't dot this?
>
>
"Well-designed" and "secure" mean different things to different folks,
but classes generic enough to be used as lego blocks have a hard time
earning those descriptions.
More information about the talk
mailing list