[nycphp-talk] security? we don't need no stinkin security!
John Lacey
jlacey at att.net
Thu Dec 4 18:21:40 EST 2003
Chris Snyder wrote:
> Tim Gales wrote:
>
>> John Lacey writes:
>> ".. wouldn't it be nice if well-designed secure components (pcom?)
>> were available that one could go to the 'lego box' and pull out what
>> you need to put it together..."
>>
>> Are you saying that Pear doesn't dot this?
>>
>>
> "Well-designed" and "secure" mean different things to different folks,
> but classes generic enough to be used as lego blocks have a hard time
> earning those descriptions.
>
>
answering one generalization with another wasn't exactly
what I had in mind, but on the other hand, I probably
deserved it
John
More information about the talk
mailing list