[nycphp-talk] database performance
csnyder
chsnyder at gmail.com
Sun Oct 30 18:24:12 EST 2005
On 10/30/05, Hans Zaunere <lists at zaunere.com> wrote:
> As Roland points out, for huge tree structures, it's better done outside of
> SQL. SQL isn't well suited for describing complex tree structures, but NSM
> has been the most versatile, robust and fastest implementation I've seen.
> I've had test trees with well over 100k rows and no problems.
Hans (or anyone) you can contact me off-list if this is too basic a
question, but what are the other ways to store tree structures outside
of SQL?
--
Chris Snyder
http://chxo.com/
More information about the talk
mailing list