NYCPHP Meetup

[Sean]

sounds like cake takes the cake

On 11/8/06, Rob Marscher <rmarscher at beaffinitive.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah... I was going to chime in and say that the chart is out of date
> with regards to the Zend Framework too.  The current preview release has
> caching and the roadmap for the 1.0 release has an auth module as well
> as many options for web services -
> <http://framework.zend.com/roadmap/components>.  I've also seen
> discussion of possible ORM options in the dev wiki.
> Zend Framework requires php5 and is not fully mature yet, so it may not
> be the best choice if you're quickly trying to get an app off the
> ground, but I think it has a bright future.  I'm also a big fan of
> CakePHP and thought the Andromeda demo app was pretty neat.  I'm not as
> familiar with the other frameworks out there.
> -Rob
>
>
> Nate Abele wrote:
> > Sean, don't look at that graphic.  It is horribly outdated, and the
> > author of the corresponding article barely did a shred of research
> > before publishing it.  The article and the graphic have been updated
> > a few times to correct some of the initial mistakes, but you can read
> > the comments here http://www.phpit.net/article/ten-different-php-
> > frameworks/ to see how many times the author had to be corrected.
> >
> > As far as actually choosing a framework, others can provide you with
> > information, but the decision should be based on your needs.  On one
> > end of the spectrum, you have the Andromeda framework, which, as Ken
> > says, is more of an "un-framework", and it's great for all kinds of
> > heavy-hitting business applications.  On the other end, you have a
> > framework like CodeIgniter, which is easy to learn and get up and
> > running with quickly.  It doesn't do everything for you, but it also
> > has probably the shortest learning curve of any major PHP framework.
> >
> > Between those two is (my framework : ) CakePHP.  Cake is well-suited
> > to doing all kinds of web applications.  It provides structure to
> > organize your code, and will handle a lot of things automatically,
> > while still allowing you to take control where you want to.
> > Hopefully that's helpful.  Granted I'm a little biased : )
> >
> > -Nate
> >
> >
> >> Message: 6
> >> Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:27:02 +0200
> >> From: Onur <onur.yerlikaya at linux.org.tr>
> >> Subject: Re: [nycphp-talk] php framework
> >> To: NYPHP Talk <talk at lists.nyphp.org>
> >> Message-ID: <45520556.3030102 at linux.org.tr>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> >>
> >> Sean wrote:
> >>
> >>> which php framework would you recommend?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> You can look this image for choosing your framework
> >> http://img115.imageshack.us/img115/3619/frameworkkarsilastirma7dm.png
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Onur Yerlikaya
> >> mailto:onur.yerlikaya at linux.org.tr
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > New York PHP Community Talk Mailing List
> > http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
> >
> > NYPHPCon 2006 Presentations Online
> > http://www.nyphpcon.com
> >
> > Show Your Participation in New York PHP
> > http://www.nyphp.org/show_participation.php
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> New York PHP Community Talk Mailing List
> http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
> NYPHPCon 2006 Presentations Online
> http://www.nyphpcon.com
>
> Show Your Participation in New York PHP
> http://www.nyphp.org/show_participation.php
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nyphp.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20061108/4a92e25d/attachment.html>