[nycphp-talk] To Smarty Or Not to Smarty: That Is The Question
LeeEyerman at aol.com
LeeEyerman at aol.com
Mon Sep 4 20:04:57 EDT 2006
TO SMARTY OR NOT TO SMARTY: THAT IS THE QUESTION
A client of mine is debating, rather furiously, the merits of using Smarty
in their upcoming web-applications. Up to this point, I have not used Smarty
- and I will admit it - I am an old school programmer who hates OOP, and to
me, Smarty looks like another ill-conceived paradigm developed in OOP that
creates a lot more hassle than it solves.
We are a small organization. We do not have more than two PHP developers
working on a project at a time. Our designer works closely with us to
integrate CSS, Javascript, etc. The web sites we create are for government agencies
and do not change often, and if they do change, they do not change very much.
I understand the concept behind smarty - separate logic and display.
However, I do not think Smarty is an end-all solution to all web sites - as many
people are trying to sell it. This article, Smarty for Dummies, shares many of
the thoughts and opinions I have about Smarty:
_http://www.fudnik.com/main/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=7_
(http://www.fudnik.com/main/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=7) - it is a good read.
Can anyone give any guidance about when to and when not to use Smarty? Does
anyone agree/disagree that Smarty may just be a giant abstraction of logic
and design, wrapped in a horrible OOP mess? Does anyone agree/disagree that
using Smarty in small applications, that do not change much, and do not have
separate (or large) development teams may be more burdensome than it is worth?
Is anyone concerned that using Smarty as part of your systems make them
less portable? Am I missing something, or is Smarty just not meant to be used
in small development environments?
I do not like the idea of developing web apps using Smarty because of the
additional requirements of installing smarty. I am also concerned that Smarty
may be built upon technologies that may be part of a current patent or part
of a patent that is pending. Smarty is not that old, and it could potentially
infringe a patent by another company like MS. I also do not know if Smarty
is supported in the open-source community as well as PHP and MySQL.
I also cannot stand the editing of multiple documents, both containing bits
and pieces of logic - I know, one is application logic, the other is display
logic.... is this really logical? Bouncing between documents does not seem
efficient, and it also seems quite possible that a web designer could still
screw up the display logic.... hmmm...
Whether you would still call Smarty a new paradigm is up for question.
However, I am having a hard time understanding any benefit for small
sites/organization who need to deliver SOLID solutions fast, on-time, and within budget.
Can anyone tell me how Smarty can increase productivity? Can it save time?
Can it save money? Does it make your web-app any more secure? Doesn't it
actually make your applications slower - all that code to process - and I know,
it does the pre-processing - but still, OOP requires more code that
procedural any day - and looking at Smarty code, it looks like a OOP mess.
Like OOP, I can do everything Smarty does, faster and easier in procedural
PHP on one page. Why in the world would I change to Smarty?
It is also interesting to note that very few open-source applications use
Smarty. PHPBB does not use it, OSCommerce does not use it, PHPMyAdmin does not
use it, etc. If Smarty were so good, why haven't more open-source projects
adopted it?
Any information that could assist my reasoning, one way or the other, would
be greatly appreciated!
Thank you in advance!
Lee
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nyphp.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20060904/b8e75636/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list