[nycphp-talk] Another stupid thing
Fernando Gabrieli
fgabrieli at gmail.com
Mon Feb 2 08:52:05 EST 2009
you could use HTTPS and a simple form for authentication...that would be
transparent to PHP and could implement a secure solution for logging users
in, i am not sure if this is what you need
fernando
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Michele Waldman <mmwaldman at nyc.rr.com>wrote:
> I'm sorry for all these stupid posts. I'm in the middle of a learning
> process. It's always darkest before the dawn.
>
>
>
> I see cookies are viewable and editable.
>
>
>
> Does anyone know if any browsers allow the user to view and edit the
> request Authorization?
>
>
>
> If I hack the mod_auth_digest file to include mysql, which I haven't
> verified is totally possible, yet, am I wasting my time.
>
>
>
> Basic authorization isn't flexible enough.
>
>
>
> What I want is to use AuthType in a secure fashion.
>
>
>
> Does it work like that?
>
>
>
> Is that stupid, too?
>
>
>
> I'm not going to be using real Digest on my server, why does mod_auth_mysql
> have to be Basic?
>
>
>
> Margaret
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> New York PHP User Group Community Talk Mailing List
> http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
> http://www.nyphp.org/show_participation.php
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nyphp.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090202/209d66b5/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list